Category: Attorneys

Karl Heideck: Philadelphian Litigator Extraordinaire

Karl Heideck is a Philadelphia Litigator Extraordinaire
Karl Heideck is a Philadelphia Litigator Extraordinaire

Have you ever heard of Karl Heideck? He is a Litigation Attorney from the wonderful Philadelphia area. First off, a litigator represents both defendants and plaintiffs in civil cases and manages all steps of the extensive litigation process which are the initial investigation, pre-trial, pleadings, trial, settlement and appeal. These cases can include arguments over property, personal injury, contracts, or anything else that needs to be disputed about in a court of law. Litigators can represent either side of the party whether it is the defendant or plaintiff. Most litigators start off as doing research and writing notes. This is how they take small steps until eventually they are ready and can confidently handle their own cases in court.

Now on to Karl Heideck, he is a Litigation Attorney who specializes in compliance practices and risk management which was not simple to become. After high school, he had to do 4 years of undergraduate study at Swarthmore College to obtain his Bachelor of Arts in English Language and Literature/ Letters from 1999-2003. Then 3 or more years of law school to obtain a J.D. (Juris Doctor) degree. He indeed did that at Temple University Beasley School of Law.

Karl Heideck was not finished yet to becoming a Litigation Attorney. He still needed to acquire his license so that he can practice law. He then had to take bar exams in which he would eventually pass to be admitted into the bar and have his license. Then Karl would work for the Pepper Hamilton Law firm where he would begin his career as a litigator and be expose to the court system where he would have is own clients and cases to manage with an impressive annual salary of around $100,000 and becoming that successful Litigation Attorney that he wanted to become.

Learn more about Karl Heideck at

Focus on the Litigation Process and Karl Heideck

At some point in a business career or in life, the odds of suing or getting sued are very high. The litigation process has remained to be a mystery to a lot of people and it can be an intimidating and frustrating experience to any lay person. The litigation process proceeds through various steps: pleadings stage, discovery, trial and an appeal in some cases. This process is only necessary when the two parties to the suit cannot settle outside court and the matter has to proceed for full trial.

Litigation Process

Each party to a suit is expected to file their papers (pleadings) explaining their side of the story concerning the dispute. The complainant approaches the court first and serves the defendant with a copy of pleadings. The defendant is given some time to respond to the complaint raised and their counter-claims if any. After the two parties complete this, the various issues to be determined by the court are well defined. The suit proceeds to the discovery stage where both parties gather all the information they have concerning the case to ensure a successful litigation process.

After this stage, which is the longest in the process, the suit proceeds to the trial stage. At the trial stage both parties present their cases before a competent judge and adduce any evidence they wish to rely on. Litigators on both sides can question and cross-examine witnesses as well as protest the admission of evidence that they feel is not admissible.

Follow @karl_heideck on Twitter for more information.

Who is a Litigator and the Education They Need

A litigator refers to a trial lawyer who is involved in the negotiations of disputes that end up in court. They can opt to specialize in real estate, contracts, personal injury or become generalists. In order to pursue a career as a litigator, you will require to complete an undergraduate degree to gain admission to a law school, attain a Juris Doctor and pass the bar exam.

About Karl Heidick

Karl Heidick is an attorney practicing in the Greater Philadelphia Area. He specializes in litigation, risk management and compliance. Karl Heidick is currently a contract attorney at Grant & Eisenhofer, PA from April, 2015. He reviews discovery materials for banking litigation and complex securities fraud. He focuses on issues touching on transactions, risk management, liquidity positions and acquisitions. Previously, Karl Heidick was a project attorney at Pepper Hamilton LLP from October 2010 to April 2014. Karl Heidick started off his career as an associate at Conrad O’Brien for eight months (January – August 2010). He represented individual and corporate clients in commercial litigation.




Why Potential Whistle Blowers Need An Attorney

Whistle blowers have a difficult time of it. They need to balance their need to tell someone about a problem against the possible ramifications of when people find out about what was said. For a lot of people blowing the whistle can end their careers; few people trust those that have gone to the authorities in order to bring someone else to justice. Because of that it may be necessary for a potential whistleblower to discuss the matter with an attorney in order to determine what protections may be available, as well as other issues that may apply. It is always best to discuss things with an attorney before making a decision of this magnitude, especially given the complexities that are sometimes involve.

At the very least, there is a sort of reward system in place. In 2010 Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act. Among other reforms, it instituted an incentive plan for whistle blowers: For those that are eligible under the precepts of the act, the Securities and Exchange Commission can offer up to 30% of all funds that are recovered. This can help someone decide who is on the fence when it comes to deciding whether or not to go to the authorities. Specific conditions of eligibility need to be discussed with an attorney, but this should be part of the conversation.

The federal government also has numerous protections for those who decide to blow the whistle on their parent company. These protections are in place in order to ensure that someone doing something illegal is punished for it; in too many cases a potential whistleblower decides to not bring his information to the authorities because he is worried about the ramifications if he does. Given the power that some companies wield this is a very legitimate worry, but that is why the protections were put in place. This can involve access to witness protection programs as well as immunity to prosecution.

Becoming a whistleblower can be a major decision, and one that requires some serious debate. The person debating such status needs to have a long discussion with an attorney who has experience with SEC whistleblower programs, especially if the company is of any significant size. The SEC is definitely interested in discussing illegal incidents with the person, but the person needs to go in with at least a general idea of what the SEC can do to help them, and only that long discussion can help with that. Fortunately there are attorneys that have the relevant experience; it is merely a matter of discussing the problem with one of them in order to determine the best course of action for the person in question.